نوع المستند : المقالة الأصلية
المؤلفون
1 قسم الصحة النفسية- كلية التربية - جامعة حلوان
2 قسم الصحة النفسية- كلية التربية- جامعة حلوان
المستخلص
الكلمات الرئيسية
الموضوعات الرئيسية
عنوان المقالة [English]
المؤلفون [English]
The current research aimed to uncover the nature of the causal relationships between psychological capital, self-compassion, psychological stress, and academic quality of life among students at Helwan University. The sample consisted of 460 male and female students from Helwan University, whose ages ranged from 18 to 23 years, with a mean age of 19.98 years and a standard deviation of 1.856. They were selected randomly. To achieve the research objectives, measurement tools were prepared by the researchers, including a psychological capital scale, a self-compassion scale, a psychological stress scale, and an academic quality of life scale. The validity and reliability of these tools were verified before implementation. The results indicated that psychological capital has a positive and direct effect on the academic quality of life and a negative effect on the dimensions of psychological stress (academic stress, family stress, social stress, economic stress, and subjective stress). However, there was no statistically significant direct effect of self-compassion on academic quality of life, while there was a statistically significant direct negative effect of self-compassion on the dimensions of psychological stress. The results indicated that the dimensions of psychological stress negatively affect academic quality of life. Additionally, the research findings revealed a statistically significant indirect effect of psychological capital on academic quality of life through psychological stress, as well as an indirect effect of self-compassion on academic quality of life via psychological stress among university students. The results also showed statistically significant differences between the mean scores of males and females in both psychological capital and self-compassion, with females demonstrating higher scores, while males scored higher in the dimensions of the psychological stress scale. However, there were no statistically significant differences in all variables based on academic specialization. Furthermore, there were statistically significant differences between the mean scores of first and fourth-year university students in psychological capital, self-compassion, and academic quality of life favoring fourth-year students, and in some dimensions of psychological stress (academic stress, economic stress, and subjective stress) favoring first-year students. Meanwhile, no significant differences were found in family and social stress based on academic year. In light of this, some recommendations and proposed research ideas were established.
الكلمات الرئيسية [English]