The research aims at:
1- Estimating the integrity level at instructors of History Department from the students point of view.
2- Investigating the differences in the integrity levels at instructors of History Department from the students point of view According to gender variable
3- (male - female)
The researcher uses the descriptive method of research because it suites
the present research topic. The society sample consists of all students of
History Department in College of Education for humanities - morning
studies which consists of (448)students (male- female), The researcher
sample consists of (224) students (male -female) chosen randomly which represents (50%) of the society sample.
A questionnaire, of (32)items is used to achieve the research aims. To gain
results the (SPSS) program is used. After analyzing the results, the following are obtained :
1- Instructors of History Department have high level of
integrity.
2- There is no statistical differences in the responses of
the study sample due to gender variable.
According to the results some recommendations and suggestions are mentioned
alshafeay, S. (2020). Integrity level at instructors of History Department in College of Education for humanities from the point of view of the students.. المجلة التربوية لکلية التربية بسوهاج, 76(76), 1-28. doi: 10.21608/edusohag.2020.103361
MLA
SADEK alshafeay. "Integrity level at instructors of History Department in College of Education for humanities from the point of view of the students.", المجلة التربوية لکلية التربية بسوهاج, 76, 76, 2020, 1-28. doi: 10.21608/edusohag.2020.103361
HARVARD
alshafeay, S. (2020). 'Integrity level at instructors of History Department in College of Education for humanities from the point of view of the students.', المجلة التربوية لکلية التربية بسوهاج, 76(76), pp. 1-28. doi: 10.21608/edusohag.2020.103361
VANCOUVER
alshafeay, S. Integrity level at instructors of History Department in College of Education for humanities from the point of view of the students.. المجلة التربوية لکلية التربية بسوهاج, 2020; 76(76): 1-28. doi: 10.21608/edusohag.2020.103361