Difficulties Facing Science Teachers in regards to Professional Licensure Examinations and the Extent to be Useful for their Training: Qualitative Study
The study aimed to explore science teachers’ perception on the difficulties that are related to professional licensure examinations. The researcher used a qualitative procedure to collect the data using interviews and short reflection journal to explore science teachers experience and expertise, which the study employed nine participants. The result infidelity five areas of difficulties, including the test, personal difficulties, major, education, and the knowledge access. Also, the study continued to explore participants' suggestions and solutions to deal with these difficulties and identify possible ways to develop training teachers’ programs. The study concluded the importance of adapting teachers’ suggestions and connecting training and preparation programs of science teachers to the standards of professional licensure.
Alessa, M. A. (2023). Difficulties Facing Science Teachers in regards to Professional Licensure Examinations and the Extent to be Useful for their Training: Qualitative Study. المجلة التربوية لکلية التربية بسوهاج, 110(110), 69-94. doi: 10.21608/edusohag.2023.305009
MLA
Matar Ahmed Alessa. "Difficulties Facing Science Teachers in regards to Professional Licensure Examinations and the Extent to be Useful for their Training: Qualitative Study", المجلة التربوية لکلية التربية بسوهاج, 110, 110, 2023, 69-94. doi: 10.21608/edusohag.2023.305009
HARVARD
Alessa, M. A. (2023). 'Difficulties Facing Science Teachers in regards to Professional Licensure Examinations and the Extent to be Useful for their Training: Qualitative Study', المجلة التربوية لکلية التربية بسوهاج, 110(110), pp. 69-94. doi: 10.21608/edusohag.2023.305009
VANCOUVER
Alessa, M. A. Difficulties Facing Science Teachers in regards to Professional Licensure Examinations and the Extent to be Useful for their Training: Qualitative Study. المجلة التربوية لکلية التربية بسوهاج, 2023; 110(110): 69-94. doi: 10.21608/edusohag.2023.305009