Summary of The Research The Professional Responsibility of Staff Faculty Members to Achieve the Quality of University Teaching 	Case Study on Minia University

Abdulrahman, Hashim

doi:10.21608/edusohag.2019.55366

Summary of The Research The Professional Responsibility of Staff Faculty Members to Achieve the Quality of University Teaching Case Study on Minia University

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Hashim Abdulrahman

Assistant Professor of Education, Faculty of Education, Minia University

10.21608/edusohag.2019.55366

Abstract

This research aims to identify the degree of professional responsibility of University staff memers in their sub-fields (Academic-Ethical-humanne, scientific, developmental, legal and social from the staff members point of view as well as from the students point of view. Also the research aims to identify if there are statistically significant differences between theoretical and scientific colleges students relating to the degree of practice areas of professional responsibility for University staff members
The resrach used the discriptive approach as well as the case study. The questionnaire was used as a tool for gathering information. A questionnaire was applied to a sample of (152) faculty stagg members at a ratio of (38,7%) from the original community. (391) located at some faculties such as (Education, Arts, Science and Computing amd Informatuion)
Abother questionnaire was applied to a sample of students counted (466) (a male and females ones) who joined theoretical faculties and (164) students who joined practical faculties, At the ratio of 28.25% from the original community (2450) students from the fourth year (Both females and males)
The data were processed statistically using the Average Response Rate and Z test for the differences between theoretical colleges and practical colleges
The results showed that the degree of practising the areas of professional responsibility from the staff members point of view, were high. They ranged between 95, and 82, in all areas of professional responsbility except comnunity responsibility, where the degree of practice was low (68,)
However from the students' point of ciew, the degree of practice of the areas of professional responsibility was high in moral responsibility (71,) yet Average at Aca\demic Responsibility (66,) at legal (65.) humanne (63.) As for social responsibility the results were of lowsignificance (62.)
There were no statistically significant differences between the degree of practice at the areas of professional responsibility for staff members anong students of theoretical colleges and students of practical colleges
At the end of the researcher presented a set of mechanisms to activate the practice of professional responsibility areas for University staff members to achieve the faculty of university teaching

Main Subjects